How many questions are in this quiz?

This quiz has 108 questions on M&A deals, approvals, and regulatory scrutiny.

What is the format of the quiz?

Each question has 4 options and there is no timer, so you can answer at your own pace.

Is the difficulty suitable for beginners?

Yes. The difficulty is mixed, combining fundamentals with tougher regulator-focused scenarios.

Can I choose the number of questions and difficulty?

Yes. You can select your preferred question count and difficulty level before starting.

What topics are covered besides antitrust?

You’ll also see deal structure, approvals, remedies, cross-border reviews, and common reasons transactions get delayed or blocked.

M&A Deals and Regulators Quiz

About this quiz

What you’ll practice

This quiz focuses on how mergers and acquisitions are structured, announced, reviewed, and sometimes blocked—especially when regulators get involved. Expect questions on antitrust logic, market definitions, remedies, and why certain deals attract extra scrutiny.

Each question gives you 4 options and there’s no timer, so you can read carefully and think through the incentives of companies and watchdogs.

Difficulty and question settings

Difficulty is mixed by design: easier items check core vocabulary (merger types, approvals, filings), while harder ones dig into edge cases like vertical integration, platform effects, and multi-jurisdiction reviews. You can choose your question count and difficulty before you start to tailor the session to a quick refresher or a deeper workout.

Common pitfalls to avoid

Confusing merger types (horizontal vs vertical vs conglomerate) and their typical regulatory concerns
Assuming “bigger company wins” without considering market definition and concentration metrics
Mixing up regulators and venues across regions (e.g., US vs EU processes)
Ignoring remedies (divestitures, behavioral commitments) that can turn a “no” into a “yes”
Overlooking timing risk: second requests, extended reviews, and political pressure

Tips for better scores

Treat each question like a mini case: identify the parties, the overlap, and the likely harm theory regulators would test. When in doubt, focus on who loses choice, who gains pricing power, and what evidence a regulator would cite to justify intervention.